Something quietly catastrophic is deepening in our world. Not in the spectacular, headline-grabbing way we have grown accustomed to, no single event, no footage on loop. Instead, it is a slow erosion that reveals itself in small moments: the way a manager speaks to a subordinate, the silence of someone who has learned not to object, the posture of a person told in a thousand subtle ways that they do not count.
What we are living through is a dignity deficit.
Unlike economic deficits, it does not appear in numbers. It appears in people. And as South Africa marks Human Rights Day, thirty years after human dignity was written into law, this is the reckoning we cannot postpone.
What dignity actually is
We often use the word dignity as though its meaning is obvious. It is not.
Dignity is one of the most philosophically contested yet viscerally understood concepts in human life. You may not be able to define it, but you know with absolute clarity when it has been taken from you.
The philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that dignity is not conferred by rank or status. It is inherent to personhood itself. Every human being possesses it not because of what they achieve or accumulate, but because they are capable of choice, reason and moral agency.
Martha Nussbaum extended this argument by showing that dignity must also be materially supported. A person denied education, safety or the ability to participate fully in society is not merely disadvantaged. They are structurally denied the conditions necessary for dignity to flourish.
African philosophy has long recognised this reality. The idea of Ubuntu – umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu – reminds us that our humanity is realised through one another. In this view, dignity is not something we possess in isolation. It exists in relationship. It is recognised, affirmed and sustained between people.
The paradox the powerful have never understood
Here is a truth societies repeatedly fail to grasp: when you strip another person of their dignity, you do not gain power. You diminish your own humanity.
The manager who humiliates a colleague in a meeting is not demonstrating authority. He is demonstrating a failure of self-knowledge. The parent who withholds warmth as discipline may believe they are building character, yet they are eroding trust in the process.
Steve Biko understood this with clarity. Colonial domination did not simply dispossess people of land; it attempted to colonise their sense of self. Liberation therefore required psychological reclamation — the refusal to accept the diminished identity imposed by oppression.
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela carried this truth in her own life. Subjected to banishment, imprisonment and systematic attempts to erase her personhood, she refused to surrender her sense of worth. “You have touched the women,” she declared in 1976, “you have struck a rock.”
This was not rhetoric. It was a declaration of being.
Both figures point to an uncomfortable truth: dignity cannot ultimately be granted by institutions. Titles, recognition and legal protections may affirm dignity where it already exists, but they cannot create it.
This is why societies can write inspiring constitutions and still live with everyday indignity. The laws may advance faster than the people responsible for living them.
What indignity looks like
Indignity rarely arrives as overt violence. More often it appears as ordinary behaviour.
It is the woman whose idea in a meeting goes unnoticed, only to receive applause when repeated by someone else. Over time, silence becomes habit. Habit becomes self-doubt.
It is the domestic worker who has cared for a family’s children for years but is never invited to sit at the table she cleans each evening. The family may not consider themselves cruel. But thoughtlessness can also erase a person.
It is the bright child in an under-resourced school whose potential goes unrecognised. By the time he leaves school, he no longer believes in the intelligence he once carried so naturally.
None of these moments break the law. They require no malice. They are failures of recognition — the inability to encounter another person in their full humanity.
And this failure is not confined to any class or community. It exists in penthouses and informal settlements, in boardrooms and bedrooms alike.
Indignity is a human condition. Which means its remedy must also be human.
Three ways we begin
First, cultivate dignity within.
A person who constantly diminishes others is often someone who has never learned to be at ease with themselves. The question worth asking is simple but uncomfortable: what do I truly believe about my own worth? The answer quietly shapes how we treat everyone around us.
Second, practise recognition.
The philosopher Axel Honneth argued that recognition – the experience of being truly seen – is a fundamental human need. In everyday life, this means attributing ideas to their source, making eye contact intentionally, and noticing who is absent from our attention. These gestures may seem small, but they form the architecture of dignity.
Third, design environments that affirm humanity.
Dignity is also shaped by systems. A feedback process that never changes anything is not participation; it is managed frustration. A school with broken infrastructure sends a message about how society values its students. Institutions communicate dignity or its absence every day through the environments they create.
The work that has no end
South Africa’s Constitution speaks with moral clarity. Section 10 states: “Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.”
Yet the distance between that principle and daily reality remains vast.
Closing that gap will not come from policy alone. It requires an internal shift — in leaders, managers, parents and citizens — to recognise that dignity is not a slogan or a legal clause. It is a practice.
Imagine a country where this principle becomes the operating system of institutions. Businesses would consider whether suppliers treat workers with respect. Boardrooms would actively seek the voices that are usually overlooked, not merely for fairness but because unseen perspectives strengthen decisions.
An economy built on human dignity would recognise domestic workers, informal traders and factory labourers not as expendable inputs but as participants whose wellbeing strengthens society as a whole.
None of this should require an economic justification. Dignity is a moral imperative, not something to be earned through productivity or performance. And yet, even on these terms, the case is clear. Employees who feel respected are more engaged, more productive and more likely to stay, while those who experience disrespect withdraw effort or leave. Poor workplace treatment is estimated to cost the global economy $ 1 trillion annually in lost productivity. Organisations that foster dignity are not only more just; they are more innovative and perform better. Dignity, in this sense, is a proven driver of performance, stability and long-term economic success.
The evidence is increasingly clear: societies that invest in dignity — through education, healthcare and fair working conditions — are not only more just. They are also more innovative, resilient and economically successful.
Dignity, it turns out, is both a moral and strategic imperative.
The philosopher Simone Weil once wrote that attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity. To truly attend to another person — to recognise their reality as fully as one recognises one’s own — is an act of profound respect.
That is what dignity ultimately asks of us.
Not perfection.
Not performance.
Simply the willingness, practiced every day, to meet another human being as though their life matters as much as our own.
Because it does.
EFF backs ANC in Johannesburg budget vote despite earlier threats:
Despite earlier threats to withhold support, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) ultimately backed the ANC in passing key budgets in the City of Johannesburg council on Friday.
The move marks a sharp reversal from the EFF’s previous stance. The party had vowed not to support any budgets in council or in the Gauteng legislature after Ekurhuleni mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza removed its MMCs and the council speaker in Ekurhuleni.
However, the red berets voted in favour of budgets tabled by ANC deputy mayor Loyiso Masuku. The final tally saw 139 councillors vote in support and 102 against, with no abstentions.
The operating budget is for salaries, repairs and maintenance, among other expenses, while the capital budget is intended for infrastructure, including upgrades and developments.
Concerns over how the projects are funded sparked debate.
Patriotic Alliance councillor Kabelo Pitso warned that the city’s growing dependence on loans, which made up 33% of the capital budget, was both “alarming” and unsustainable.
“In this council chamber, I’ve heard councillors say we are paying our loans well, which means we can keep taking out more loans. But, madam speaker, loans have interest and that is what worries me.
“These loans help upgrade critical infrastructure but their financial implications cannot be overlooked. These loans are putting pressure on our annual budgets. Therefore, the funding model based on loans must be reviewed.”
Pitso cautioned that the city’s “aggressive reliance” on borrowing could lead to a “disastrous situation” and questioned whether mayor Dada Morero would be able to steer Johannesburg away from the model.
ANC councillor David Modupi pushed back, accusing some parties of turning the budget process into a political battleground.
“There are those in council who want to turn everything into politics, even something as serious as a budget,” he said.
Some political parties “want to oppose, criticise and reject everything”, he said, noting that for residents, “this is not just a debate as they are living in difficult conditions”.
Mchunu demands that Mkhwanazi provide evidence of corruption:
Suspended police minister Senzo Mchunu has hit back against the allegations of corruption KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi made, demanding evidence.
Mchunu said Mkhwanazi had made unsubstantiated accusations against him at parliament’s police ad hoc committee on the last day of witness testimony.
Mkhwanazi told the ad hoc committee that he believed Mchunu had been “captured” by criminal cartels who had influenced him to write the disbandment letter for the political killings task team.
“But he doesn’t accept that, he owns [the letter]. He said he wrote the letter on his own iPad,” said Mkhwanazi.
In a statement, Mchunu said he rejected the allegations. “I would like to reiterate that I am not part of any criminal syndicate of any kind. I am part of those who are fighting against corruption in the country and my record in government speaks for itself.”
Mchunu said Mkhwanazi often changed his accusations, earlier calling him corrupt whereas he had previously blamed the minister for “negligence” and recently said he was an “enabler for criminality to thrive”.
Mchunu said Mkhwanazi acted as the “complainant” and investigator and was involved in prosecution based on the allegations he made. “He also makes judgmental comments saying that I am guilty of defeating the ends of justice.
“All these statements are made without placing any evidence on record in support of such even where he has undertaken to do so. I state here that these allegations are untrue, unfounded and deliberately intended to tarnish my reputation,” Mchunu said.
Mchunu addressed the prisoner letter tip-off Mkhwanazi presented at the ad hoc committee, which detailed conversations between an inmate and businessman and alleged leader of the Big Five cartel Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala.
“The letter alleges that a conference call was held between the former national director of public prosecutions advocate Shamila Batohi, Mr Matlala’s lawyer, advocate Laurance Hodes, and me.
“The meeting is alleged to have discussed plans to coerce Mr Matlala to sign an affidavit stating that he does not know me. He further added that my two lawyers subsequently went to Kgosi Mampuru prison to obtain the signature of Mr Matlala on the affidavit,” Mchunu said.
He said Mkhwanazi had stated that the handwritten letter alleged that Matlala gave Mchunu up to R5 million.
“Lieutentant general Mkhwanazi presents no proof whatsoever in support of any of these serious allegations presented on public platforms. Further, he introduces additional new allegations and changes his statements in different appearances,” Mchunu added.
Submit and get free exposure here: Showcase Your Business | Advertise Your Special Offers.
